Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portabello Eggs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Portabello Eggs was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was transwiki to Wikibooks. As of 17:31, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC), this article is still in the queue to be moved. Rossami (talk)


This is a recipe, not encyclopedic 15:48, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)

  • (Note: the above was posted by CDN99) I vote to transwiki to Wikibooks. Livajo 16:38, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Ditto on the transwiki to Wikibooks. -- Bobdoe 17:05, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Tasty, but non-encyclopedic. TW to Wikibooks, and I volnteer to help with any, er, fact-checking required ;} -FZ 17:15, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Transwiki and delete. I'll just take mine scrambled, please, with salt. Geogre 17:53, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Man, that sounds good, and while I usually try to rework recipes into proper articles this one is pretty self-explanatory. Delete.--Samuel J. Howard 05:45, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)
  • Transwiki to Wikicipes. Or whatever is closest. :) (And man, now I want to go to Village Inn and have their portabello-red pepper-eggs-and-home fries skillet.) - KeithTyler 19:12, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete or transwiki - just not in the encyclopedia! --Cje 22:06, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete or transwiki. Recipe. --Improv 23:19, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • This has already been discussed and decided. It is in the queue for transwiki to Wikibooks. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old#Needing Transwiki — Wikipedia:Transwiki log. Rossami

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.