User talk:Zxcvbnm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your GA nomination of Klobb[edit]

The article Klobb you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Klobb for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Le Panini -- Le Panini (talk) 07:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources[edit]

Hi Zxcvbnm, thank you for your last review of Draft:World War II: TCG

We resubmitted our game a few days ago, adding more reliable sources. Our only concern though is regarding your last comment:

Fails WP:GNG; lacks a reception section or reliable sources, and only one review was found in English from a reliable game journalism source. Unless there are more significant sources in other languages, this doesn't seem like it will pass notability guidelines

In our case, we are a small videogame studio located in Spain and the sources we have been mentioned into or that have talked about us are quite reliable in our country to be honest. We have not much coverage on international press/sources but we do on Spain. Also, the Wikipedia:Notability page specifically says:

There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected.[3] Sources do not have to be available online or written in English

Hoping you reconsider your review, Respectfully, Cgascons (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@Cgascons:I probably phrased that slightly wrong, what I meant was that it lacks reviews (e.g. significant mentions) from reliable sources. Mere announcements do not indicate any sort of independent critical analysis. Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, Wikipedia treats creative works in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works. This cannot be gained from simply press releases and descriptions of the game and must include reviews that at least demonstrate the game's reception and influence, which are largely not seen here.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
@Zxcvbnm:Hi again, after asking for some help in the Kiwi IRC chat I reviewed the article, removed the unencyclopedic terms that were being used, and added a Reception section with 3 reviews of the game (in english). Hoping you reconsider reviewing the article again, kind regards. Cgascons (talk) 11:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Please see[edit]

Please see Talk:Child Protective Services#Requested move 30 December 2020. ─ The Aafī (talk) 07:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.


Happy New Year![edit]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blaster Master Zero 2 has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Blaster Master Zero 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 18% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)