Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Roanoke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neo Roanoke[edit]

An "antogonist" (sic) of some "Gundam" series; "all we really know about him is that he is the commander of an Earth Alliance ship the Girty Lue". Non-encyclopedic fancruft. -- Hoary 06:07, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep. If not very notable, redirect to Gundam Seed Destiny. utcursch 06:22, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
  • F.E.C.E.S.. We are not a fan site and don't need the latest scoop on this sort of thing. Delete. -R. fiend 06:26, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep or redirect. And please find a more civil acronym. Kappa 07:13, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • del. Mikkalai 09:07, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Junk fanstuff. If it were redirected it would be neither here nor there, except Roanoke, Virginia could conceivably have some group some day that wants the name. Geogre 15:46, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge to Gundam Seed Destiny without redirect. GOOPTI. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:59, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge to Gundam Seed Destiny without redirect. Jacob1207 05:18, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect. -Sean Curtin 23:29, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete as fancruft. A Merge into Gundam Seed Destiny is also ok if people think this person is important enough to the show's mythos to mention there. Indrian 04:53, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge for now. If handled properly there is nothing wrong with "fancruft" and we should probably avoid derogatory attacks on perfectly well written and informative articles. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 17:36, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I'd question whether this article fit those criteria, but I agree with avoiding derogatory attacks. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:43, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge Not worthy of its own article. - Trick 22:42, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment Merge without redirect is an illegal action, we need to preserve edit history. Suggest counting as plain merge. Kim Bruning 18:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I was under the impression that merge without redirect is merely a more complicated operation, not an "illegal" one. WP:DP states "merge into [[article]] and delete is only a valid option if the information on authorship of the content is somehow preserved" but does not state that the option is illegal. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:43, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, no redirect, no merge: fancruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:27, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)