Talk:Odalisque

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Turkey (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Gender Studies  
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender Studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Note: Part of this article is taken from the public domain 1913 edition of Webster's Dictionary. -- Karada 16:09, 4 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Concubine or not?[edit]

An odalisque was a female slave or concubine in the Ottoman Seraglio

[…]

An odalisque was not a concubine of the harem

Ian Spackman 09:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Images[edit]

Currently there are two images, both depicting the European orientalist erotic fantasy version of the odalisque. This seems out of balance considering how controversial and discredited this form of bourgeois pornography has become, gorgeous though the paintings are. Surely a single image of such a painting would be more appropriate, ideally set against another image representing a very different point of view. Ireneshusband 18:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

The pictures don't seem to show 'court ladies' servicing higher ranking women. Jonpatterns (talk) 12:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Law Society of British Columbia paragraph[edit]

The final paragraph of the article contributes very little to the subject. But it, and its cited source, are so funny that I hope it is retained. Maproom (talk) 21:53, 6 August 2013 (UTC)